Every keyboard layout, explained honestly
Should you switch to a different keyboard layout?
For comfort, not speed. The classic study “The Fable of the Keys” (Liebowitz & Margolis) found no reliable speed advantage for Dvorak over QWERTY. The same honesty applies to every layout below. Switch for hand comfort, not a speed windfall, and budget a real adjustment: roughly 8 WPM on day 1, 53 by day 30, parity around day 90.
Latin script
QWERTY (US)
ansiThe default layout almost everyone starts on: the baseline every other layout is measured against.
Read the guide →QWERTY (UK)
isoUS QWERTY's British sibling: same letters, £ instead of #, and an extra ISO key for \|.
Read the guide →AZERTY (France)
isoFrance's national layout: A/Q and Z/W swapped, numbers behind Shift, and accents living on the number row.
Read the guide →QWERTZ (Germany)
isoThe German-speaking world's layout: Z and Y swap, and ä ö ü ß get keys of their own.
Read the guide →Spanish (Spain)
isoSpain's layout: Ñ gets a dedicated key, and áéíóú stay one dead-key tap away.
Read the guide →Colemak
ansiA 2006 QWERTY alternative that keeps Ctrl+Z/X/C/V in place while moving the rest onto stronger fingers.
Read the guide →Colemak-DH
ansiA 2014 community refinement of Colemak that pulls D and H down into the easier-to-reach bottom-row inner columns.
Read the guide →Dvorak
ansiPatented in 1936 to put the most common English letters on the home row under your strongest fingers.
Read the guide →Workman
ansiA 2010 layout that weighs sideways finger movement as heavily as row travel: not just 'how far,' but 'how awkwardly.'
Read the guide →Graphite
ansiA 2022 algorithmically-generated, hand-tuned layout built for high rolls and low same-finger travel, with programmer-friendly punctuation.
Read the guide →